<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Playing Around with the WP Image Feature</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.deborahwoehr.com/blog/2006/01/23/playing-around-with-the-wp-image-feature/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.deborahwoehr.com/blog/2006/01/23/playing-around-with-the-wp-image-feature/</link>
	<description>Author, Designer, Problogger</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 07:33:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: deborah.woehr</title>
		<link>http://www.deborahwoehr.com/blog/2006/01/23/playing-around-with-the-wp-image-feature/comment-page-1/#comment-220</link>
		<dc:creator>deborah.woehr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2006 18:36:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deborahwoehr.com/blog/?p=145#comment-220</guid>
		<description>I'm keeping my fingers crossed because aside from the image issue, I like 2.0 better than 1.5.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m keeping my fingers crossed because aside from the image issue, I like 2.0 better than 1.5.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John (Syntagma)</title>
		<link>http://www.deborahwoehr.com/blog/2006/01/23/playing-around-with-the-wp-image-feature/comment-page-1/#comment-218</link>
		<dc:creator>John (Syntagma)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2006 18:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deborahwoehr.com/blog/?p=145#comment-218</guid>
		<description>Yep, I'm going to stick with 1.5 for my others. Of course, there may be a good plugin on the way for 2.0. Let's hope so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, I&#8217;m going to stick with 1.5 for my others. Of course, there may be a good plugin on the way for 2.0. Let&#8217;s hope so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deborah.woehr</title>
		<link>http://www.deborahwoehr.com/blog/2006/01/23/playing-around-with-the-wp-image-feature/comment-page-1/#comment-217</link>
		<dc:creator>deborah.woehr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2006 18:16:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deborahwoehr.com/blog/?p=145#comment-217</guid>
		<description>I'll check my email, John. I agree that they really botched the image feature with this version. If I can find a way to fix it, I will post a tutorial. In the meantime, I've kept 1.5 for my blog on Scratchboard Art, since I will rely heavily on the image feature.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll check my email, John. I agree that they really botched the image feature with this version. If I can find a way to fix it, I will post a tutorial. In the meantime, I&#8217;ve kept 1.5 for my blog on Scratchboard Art, since I will rely heavily on the image feature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John (Syntagma)</title>
		<link>http://www.deborahwoehr.com/blog/2006/01/23/playing-around-with-the-wp-image-feature/comment-page-1/#comment-215</link>
		<dc:creator>John (Syntagma)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2006 18:12:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deborahwoehr.com/blog/?p=145#comment-215</guid>
		<description>By the strangest fate I sent you a despairing email about an hour ago which is very similar to this post. I don't know what Matt and the others are playing at, but the old IImage plugin on 1.5 was so much easier to use and more stable than the system they have now. Any fixing of this bug will probably not be reflected in sites already set up under Fantastico. So they will be image-deficient for the rest of their lives. Baaah!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the strangest fate I sent you a despairing email about an hour ago which is very similar to this post. I don&#8217;t know what Matt and the others are playing at, but the old IImage plugin on 1.5 was so much easier to use and more stable than the system they have now. Any fixing of this bug will probably not be reflected in sites already set up under Fantastico. So they will be image-deficient for the rest of their lives. Baaah!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
