Comments on: The Anthology: Stage Two

By: Gone Away

Gone Away — Tue, 21 Feb 2006 03:19:08 +0000

Puts hand up to receive the PDF…

By: deborah.woehr

deborah.woehr — Sat, 18 Feb 2006 16:12:11 +0000

Now that I’m a bit more awake (thank god for sugar and caffeine!), I understand what you’re getting at. For now, I’ll stick with Plan B. Once I get this book compiled, I’ll need plenty of critiques.

By: Melly

Melly — Sat, 18 Feb 2006 15:12:19 +0000

I’ll give you a plan C, but I think it’s stupid, so better stick with your author plan.

I was thinking you can keep the genre headings and have contributors at the end of the book, not at each entry. But your plan sounds better, because it actually relates entry to writer-blogger.

By: deborah.woehr

deborah.woehr — Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:40:15 +0000

John: You’re not the only bashful one. Just jot down a blurb about your books and your blog network.

Marti: No, this isn’t going to be strictly an ebook. I’m compiling a draft first, which I will send to the contributors for them to proofread their entries for any mistakes I’ve made. Once I get the manuscript polished, I’ll shop it around to publishers.

Oh, and yes, I’m using Acrobat so everyone can read it.

By: Marti

Marti — Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:34:06 +0000

That makes sense, to go by author name. I guess you could do cross-referencing, but that could get congested LOL

Is this strictly an e-book?

Are you using Adobe Acrobat?

Really proud of you for taking this on! Best wishes!

By: John (Syntagma)

John (Syntagma) — Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:05:10 +0000

Yes, I think the author division is the most logical one, Deborah. And, you remind me, I still haven’t sent you my biog. It will come today - promise. I actually don’t like writing about myself (modest English genes - a Hugh Grant sort of thing), so it’s a bit of a struggle. however, I’ll find something to put in.

Yes, I’d like to receive the PDF. Thanks.