Unsurprisingly, there is still no word from Lulu’s management about their position regarding Amazon. I also wasn’t surprised when I couldn’t find anything about this publishing coup on Amazon or BookSurge. This hasn’t stopped stopped people from reacting, both inside and outside of the blogosphere. The list below is from Beyond Niche Marketing, who has compiled a list of 62 people who have commented on this development.

You’ll find more reactions on the Lulu forum: Does Lulu Have Any Comments on the Latest Amazon Development? Lulu author, Anita Stewart has set up a petition for anyone who is interested. You can access it here.

Share and Enjoy:These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • blinkbits
  • BlinkList
  • blogmarks
  • co.mments
  • del.icio.us
  • De.lirio.us
  • digg
  • Fark
  • feedmelinks
  • Furl
  • NewsVine
  • Spurl
  • YahooMyWeb

Related posts:

  1. Backlash Over Amazon Monopoly Tactics . . . Continued I thought this monopoly tactic with Amazon was a...
  2. Will Amazon Become the Google of the POD Industry? When Marti sent me the link to the Washington Post’s...
  3. Amazon Stands by Its Decision Despite the backlash from irate authors, Amazon is standing firm...
  4. BookSurge: The Good, The Bad, and The Downright Ugly I decided to do a little research on BookSurge to...
  5. Prosperity Listed on Amazon When I wrote yesterday’s post, I honestly didn’t expect to...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

Tags: , ,

6 Comments to “Backlash Over Amazon Monopoly Tactics”

  1. Author says:

    A good case can be made that what Amazon is attempting to do violates anti-trust laws. Waiting for federal anti-trust action would take many years–years to get the Justice Department to act, years of trials, years of fussing over what the court decision means. Notice how long it took to deal with Microsoft’s tactics, despite the fact that the corporations they were bullying were large and powerful. None of us can afford that long a wait.

    Action at the state level, however, could move much faster, particularly if it involves off-the-record contact and a somber warning from those who can make trouble for Amazon. Amazon is headquartered in Seattle about a ten minute drive from the office of the Antitrust division of the Washington state attorney general. Here’s the contact information:

    Office of the Attorney General

    Antitrust Division

    800 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2000

    Seattle, WA 98104-3188

    http://www.atg.wa.gov/Antitrust/default.aspx

    Telephone: 206-587-5510

    Fax: 206-464-6338

    Note the remark on that web page that “The Antitrust Division only processes complaints that involve either Washington State residents or businesses located in Washington State.” Amazon is in Washington state, so it matters not where you are. You might also want to raise the issue with your state attorney general’s antitrust office, asking them to get in touch with their colleagues in Seattle. If you’re a publisher, encourage your authors to write. If you’re an author, encourage other writers to contact them.

  2. Thank you so much for providing a link to my blog article. In light of the response by Jeff Bezos, I am posting a second one today. I really think this issue shows the common ground that small presses and POD publishers/authors can find, in spite of our sometimes vocal differences.

  3. deborah.woehr says:

    Author: Thanks for the tips and the contact information. ;)

    Mary: You’re quite welcome. I hope Jeff Bezos listens to what his customers have to say.

  4. [...] Backlash Over Amazon Monopoly Tactics by Deborah Woehr [...]

  5. Author says:

    Those who deplore this move can also contact Amazon’s legal department. Be polite but firm pointing out that, like Microsoft before it, Amazon may face serious legal consequences for this action.

    Legal Department
    Amazon.com, Inc.
    PO Box 81226
    Seattle WA 98108

    Phone: (206) 622-2335
    Fax: (206) 694-2530

    This appears to be their sole in-house attorney:

    L. Michelle Wilson, whose legal credentials are here:

    http://pview.findlaw.com/view/.....channel=LP

    Notice that she appears to have no particular background in antitrust law.

    We may have had some conversation at one time and, if so, she reminds me of many Microsoft employees I talked with during its long antitrust battle. Feel sorry for her, as I did for them. These people aren’t evil themselves. They simply lack the moral independence to grasp that a corporation that treats them nicely and pays them well could do something unethical. Unfortunately, as silent partners they can play as much a role in a business’ downfall as those within it who are totally without any moral compass–the usual Social Darwinian, might makes right sort that seem to have the helm at Amazon.

    For what can happen to Amazon if Amazon does not change and we persevere, look for recent news stories about the major decline in Microsoft’s ranking in both the IT community and with corporate executives. Ten years ago, with the release of Windows 98, frustration and anger at Microsoft was a little-noted grassroots movement, Microsoft was the darling of the stock market, and Apple was said to be doomed. Look how much has changed.

  6. [...] by “Author” at Deborah Woehr’s post, that Might Makes Right is an attitude (or a governmentally invoked perk, your choice), we follow [...]

Leave a Reply

You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>